Related Studies

Carroll, J. B. (1964)

Language and thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [1]

Chotlos, J. W. (1944)

Studies in language behavior IV: A statistical and comparative analysis of individual written language samples. Psychological Monographs, 56(2), 77–111. [2]

Covington, M. A., & McFall, J. D. (2010)

Cutting the Gordian knot: The moving-average type–token ratio (MATTR). Journal of quantitative linguistics, 17(2), 94-100. [3]

Guiraud, P. (1960)

Probl`emes et m ́ethodes de la statistique linguistique[Problems and methods of linguistic statistics]. Dordrecht: Reidel. [4]

Herdan, G. (1960)

Type-token mathematics: A textbook of mathematical linguistics. The Hague: Mouton. [5]

Hess, C. W., Haug, H., & Landry, R. G. (1989)

The reliability of type-token ratios for the oral language of school age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32(3), 536–540. [6]

Hess, C. W., Sefton, K. M., & Landry, R. G. (1986)

Sample size and type-token ratios for oral language of preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29(1), 129–134. [7]

Jarvis, S., & Hashimoto, B. J. (2021)

How operationalizations of word types affect measures of lexical diversity. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 7(1), 163-194. [8]

Johnson, W. (1944)

Studies in language behavior 1: A program of research. Psychological Monographs, 56, 1-15. [9]

Koizumi, R. (2012)

Relationships between text length and lexical diversity measures: Can we use short texts of less than 100 tokens? Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 1(1), 60–69. [10]

Koizumi, R., & In'nami, Y. (2012)

Effects of text length on lexical diversity measures: Using short texts with less than 200 tokens. System, 40(4), 554–564. [11]

Kyle, K., Crossley, S. A., & Jarvis, S. (2021)

Assessing the validity of lexical diversity indices using direct judgements. Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(2), 154-170. [12]

Maas, H. D. (1972)

Über den Zusammenhang zwischen Wortschatzumfang und L ̈ange eines Textes [On the relationship between vocabulary and the length of a text].Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 2(8), 73. [13]

Malvern, D. D., & Richards, B. J. (1997)

A new measure of lexical diversity. British Studies in Applied Linguistics, 12, 58–71. [14]

Malvern, D. D, & Richards, B. J. (2002)

Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19(1), 85–104. [15]

Malvern, D. D., & Richards, B. J., Chipere, N., & Durán, P. (2004)

Lexical diversity and language development (pp. 16-30). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [16]

McCarthy, P. M. (2005)

An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual lexical diversity (MTLD) (Doctoral dissertation). Memphis, TN: University of Memphis. [17]

McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2007)

Vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Language Testing, 24(4), 459–488. [18]

McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010)

MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392. [19]

Tweedie, F. J., & Baayen, R. H. (1998)

How variable may a constant be? Measures of lexical richness in perspective. Computers and the Humanities, 32(5), 323–352. [20]

Yule, G. U. (1944)

The statistical study of literary vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [21]

Zenker, F., & Kyle, K. (2021)

Investigating minimum text lengths for lexical diversity indices. Assessing Writing, 47, 100505. [22]